Emma Stokes

80 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Emma Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Rehabilitation 512
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 34
  • Occupational Therapy 95
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 72
  • Family Practice 23
Replace Brian J. Dudgeon with:
Brian J. Dudgeon United States
Cylie Williams Australia
Leslie G. Portney United States
Efraim Jaul Israel
Sara McEwen Canada
Catherine Elizabeth Lightbody United Kingdom
Julie M. Whitman United States
Louise Gustafsson Australia
Julie K. Tilson United States
Jennifer Klaber Moffett United Kingdom
Emma Stokes relative to Brian J. Dudgeon United States Brian J. Dudgeon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Brian J. Dudgeon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Stokes. The network helps show where Emma Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Stokes Line = papers co-authored together Emma Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014114
2 201199
3 200895
4 201284
5 201762
6 200558
7 200857
8 201556
9
The effect of GENTLE/s robot mediated therapy on upper extremity function post stroke
200347
10 202045
11 199643
12 201336
13 200835
14
Using haptics technology to deliver motivational therapies in stroke patients: concepts and initial pilot studies
200133
15 202132
16 202132
17 200831
18 200830
19 201528
20 201426

About Emma Stokes

Emma Stokes is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health, Occupational Therapy and Pharmacology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (23 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (13 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (13 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (12 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (7 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (5 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (512 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (34 citations), Occupational Therapy (95 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (72 citations) and Family Practice (23 citations). Emma Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rose Galvin, Tara Cusack, Thomas Brendan Murphy, Susan Coote, Tracy Bury, William Harwin, Desmond O’Neill, Claire Donnellan, Sara Hayes and Mansour Abdullah Alshehri. Their work appears in journals such as Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy Reviews, Disability and Rehabilitation, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact