Tim Dare

472 citations
35 papers · 230 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

  • Law 11
    • Legal Education and Practice Innovations 8
    • Legal principles and applications 3
    • Law in Society and Culture 2
    • Ethics in medical practice 4

Tim Dare

29 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers

Tim Dare
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 24
  • Philosophy 50
  • Health 29
  • Law 36
  • Pharmacy 14
Replace Andreas Frewer with:
Andreas Frewer Germany
Norman Daniels United States
Meltem Kürtüncü Türkiye
Bruce D. Weinstein United States
Hannah Chimowitz United States
Anton A. van Niekerk South Africa
Greg M. Kramer United States
Heather Rennie Canada
Bette‐Jane Crigger United States
Emma Angell United Kingdom
Tim Dare relative to Andreas Frewer Germany Andreas Frewer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Andreas Frewer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Dare

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Dare's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Dare with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Dare more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Dare

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Dare. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Dare. The network helps show where Tim Dare may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Tim Dare, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Dare Line = papers co-authored together Tim Dare links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199833
2 200430
3 200929
4
The Counsel of Rogues?: A Defence of the Standard Conception of the Lawyer's Role
200925
5 201824
6 201312
7 19988
8 20088
9 20167
10
Digital contact tracing for COVID-19: a primer for policymakers
20206
11 20195
12
Professional Ethics and Personal Integrity
20105
13 20224
14 20174
15 20144
16 20093
17 20103
18
Australia, a nation of immigrants
19883
19 20013
20 20222

About Tim Dare

Tim Dare is a scholar working on Law, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health and Information Systems, having authored 35 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (8 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing (3 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Legal principles and applications (3 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (24 citations), Philosophy (50 citations), Health (29 citations), Law (36 citations) and Pharmacy (14 citations). Tim Dare has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Baker, Tim Cook, Laura V. Duggan, E. O’Sullivan, W. Bradley Wendel, Rhema Vaithianathan, Sarah R. Anderson, Christine Swanton, Anna Brown and M. J. Ryan. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Anesthesia, Philosophical Topics, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Bioethics and Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact