Greg M. Kramer

7 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Greg M. Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Applied Psychology 63
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 110
  • General Health Professions 79
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Clinical Psychology 51
Replace Robert C. Hsiung with:
Robert C. Hsiung United States
Natali Rauseo-Ricupero United States
Azra Daei Iran
Victoria Betton United Kingdom
Brian Lo Canada
Diane M. Wieland United States
Asta Medišauskaitė United Kingdom
Nathan Hodson United Kingdom
Leonardo Cubillos United States
Sigalit Warshawski Israel
Greg M. Kramer relative to Robert C. Hsiung United States Robert C. Hsiung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Robert C. Hsiung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Greg M. Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greg M. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg M. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg M. Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Greg M. Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg M. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg M. Kramer. The network helps show where Greg M. Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Greg M. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Greg M. Kramer Line = papers co-authored together Greg M. Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2015106
2 201448
3 200743
4 201213
5 20094
6 20013
7 20052

About Greg M. Kramer

Greg M. Kramer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Health, having authored 7 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Jury Decision Making Processes (1 paper) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (63 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (110 citations), General Health Professions (79 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations) and Clinical Psychology (51 citations). Greg M. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Matt Mishkind, Kirk Heilbrun, Julie T. Kinn, Steven Chan, Allison Crawford, Su‐Ting T. Li, John Teshima, Peter Yellowlees, John Luo and Nadiya Sunderji. Their work appears in journals such as Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, International Review of Psychiatry and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact