Greg M. Kramer
Impact in
-
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation 5
- Innovations in Medical Education 1
-
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 1
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 1
- Co-authors
- Matthew C. Mishkind (3 shared papers)Julie T. Kinn (1 shared paper)Kirk Heilbrun (3 shared papers)John S Luo (1 shared paper)Donald M. Hilty (1 shared paper)Steven Richard Chan (1 shared paper)John Teshima (1 shared paper)Peter Yellowlees (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (2 papers)International Review of Psychiatry (1 paper)Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (1 paper)Behavioral Sciences & the Law (1 paper)Professional Psychology Research and Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Greg M. Kramer
9 papers receiving 375 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 269
- Applied Psychology 41
- Health Informatics 8
- Law 33
- Social Psychology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Greg M. Kramer
This map shows the geographic impact of Greg M. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg M. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg M. Kramer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Greg M. Kramer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg M. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg M. Kramer. The network helps show where Greg M. Kramer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Greg M. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 134 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 124 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 3 |
About Greg M. Kramer
Greg M. Kramer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Law, Social Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Penology (1 paper), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (1 paper), Legal processes and jurisprudence (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (269 citations), Applied Psychology (41 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations), Law (33 citations) and Social Psychology (38 citations). Greg M. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Matthew C. Mishkind, Julie T. Kinn, Kirk Heilbrun, John S Luo, Donald M. Hilty, Steven Richard Chan, John Teshima, Peter Yellowlees, Su‐Ting T. Li and Nadiya Sunderji. Their work appears in journals such as Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, International Review of Psychiatry, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, Behavioral Sciences & the Law and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.