Thomas Schatz
Impact in
-
- Language Development and Disorders
-
- Phonetics and Phonology Research
Papers in
-
- Speech Recognition and Synthesis 7
- Speech and dialogue systems 4
-
- Speech and Audio Processing 8
- Co-authors
- Emmanuel Dupoux (12 shared papers)Francis Bach (5 shared papers)Naomi H. Feldman (5 shared papers)Hynek Heřmanský (2 shared papers)Vijayaditya Peddinti (2 shared papers)Aren Jansen (1 shared paper)Gabriel Synnaeve (3 shared papers)Sharon Goldwater (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cognitive Science (1 paper)The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (1 paper)Psychological Science (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Open Mind (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas Schatz
16 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 140
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 127
- Signal Processing 109
- Pharmacy 33
- Artificial Intelligence 188
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Schatz
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Schatz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Schatz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Schatz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Schatz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Schatz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Schatz. The network helps show where Thomas Schatz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Schatz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 14 | Input matters in the modeling of early phonetic learning | 2020 | 1 |
| 15 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 0 |
About Thomas Schatz
Thomas Schatz is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 17 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (8 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (8 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (7 papers), Language Development and Disorders (6 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Language and cultural evolution (1 paper) and Optical Coatings and Gratings (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (140 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (127 citations), Signal Processing (109 citations), Pharmacy (33 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (188 citations). Thomas Schatz has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel Dupoux, Francis Bach, Naomi H. Feldman, Hynek Heřmanský, Vijayaditya Peddinti, Aren Jansen, Gabriel Synnaeve, Sharon Goldwater, Alejandrina Cristià and Reiko Mazuka. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Science, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Psychological Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Open Mind.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.