Thomas Ryckman

22 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Thomas Ryckman
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Theoretical Computer Science 69
  • History and Philosophy of Science 183
  • General Psychology 13
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 79
Replace Brent Mundy with:
Brent Mundy United States
Christopher Pincock United States
Thomas Mormann Spain
Friedrich Stadler Austria
Leo Corry Israel
Yemima Ben‐Menahem Israel
James W. McAllister Netherlands
Gerald J. Massey United States
Russell McCormmach United States
E. J. Dijksterhuis United States
Thomas Ryckman relative to Brent Mundy United States Brent Mundy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Brent Mundy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ryckman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ryckman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ryckman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ryckman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ryckman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ryckman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ryckman. The network helps show where Thomas Ryckman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Ryckman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Ryckman Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Ryckman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200555
2 198950
3 200538
4 199129
5 199625
6 200223
7 199219
8 200812
9 199311
10 199410
11 199510
12 19889
13 20176
14 19906
15 20084
16 20142
17 20032
18 20182
19 20112
20
Bridging Two Gulfs: Hermann Weyl
20121

About Thomas Ryckman

Thomas Ryckman is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Theoretical Computer Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (13 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (7 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper) and Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (69 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (183 citations), General Psychology (13 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (79 citations). Thomas Ryckman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Pietro Mancosu, Katherine Brading, Paul A. Roth, J. Alberto Coffa, Michael A. Gottfried, Zellig S. Harris, Stephen E. Harris, Paul Mattick, Jordi Cat and Lola Fleck. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, The Philosophical Review, Synthese, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact