Leo Corry

1.4k citations
57 papers · 773 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Leo Corry

47 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Leo Corry
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Theoretical Computer Science 407
  • History and Philosophy of Science 280
  • Geometry and Topology 112
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 208
  • Mathematical Physics 70
Replace Erhard Scholz with:
Erhard Scholz Germany
David E. Rowe Germany
Detlef Laugwitz Germany
Carl B. Boyer United States
Andrés Romarís Pais United States
David B. Malament United States
Hans Halvorson United States
Judith V. Grabiner United States
Wilfried Sieg United States
Richard Dedekind Germany
Leo Corry relative to Erhard Scholz Germany Erhard Scholz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Erhard Scholz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leo Corry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo Corry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo Corry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo Corry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo Corry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo Corry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo Corry. The network helps show where Leo Corry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Leo Corry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leo Corry Line = papers co-authored together Leo Corry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004189
2 200493
3 199787
4 199782
5 199752
6 199248
7 198929
8 199815
9 199714
10 201314
11 200613
12
Hilbert and physics (1900-1915)
199610
13 199810
14 200710
15 19939
16 20048
17 20078
18
The origins of the definition of abstract rings
20007
19 20007
20 20176

About Leo Corry

Leo Corry is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Geometry and Topology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 773 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (37 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (16 papers), Mathematics and Applications (13 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (10 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (4 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (407 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (280 citations), Geometry and Topology (112 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (208 citations) and Mathematical Physics (70 citations). Leo Corry has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Renn, John Stachel, Norbert Schappacher, Tal Golan, Yehuda Elkana and Alexandre Métraux. Their work appears in journals such as Science in Context, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Synthese, Historia Mathematica and Configurations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact