Leo Corry

1.4k citations
38 papers · 482 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Leo Corry

32 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Leo Corry
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Theoretical Computer Science 232
  • History and Philosophy of Science 177
  • Geometry and Topology 66
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 100
  • Mathematical Physics 37
Replace David E. Rowe with:
David E. Rowe Germany
Karen Hunger Parshall United States
Andrés Romarís Pais United States
Israel Kleiner Canada
Thomas William Barrett United States
Victor Katz United States
David B. Malament United States
Reinhard Siegmund‐Schultze Norway
Constance Reid United States
Raymond Ayoub United States
Leo Corry relative to David E. Rowe Germany David E. Rowe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
David E. Rowe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leo Corry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo Corry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo Corry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo Corry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo Corry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo Corry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo Corry. The network helps show where Leo Corry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Leo Corry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leo Corry Line = papers co-authored together Leo Corry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004136
2 199758
3 199749
4 200443
5 199231
6 198928
7 199723
8 199711
9 199811
10 201310
11 19939
12 20048
13 20077
14
The origins of the definition of abstract rings
20006
15 19986
16
Hilbert and physics (1900-1915)
19966
17 20176
18 20075
19 20074
20 20104

About Leo Corry

Leo Corry is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Geometry and Topology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (26 papers), Mathematics and Applications (9 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (8 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (5 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (232 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (177 citations), Geometry and Topology (66 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (100 citations) and Mathematical Physics (37 citations). Leo Corry has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Renn, John Stachel, Tal Golan, Norbert Schappacher, Alexandre Métraux and Yehuda Elkana. Their work appears in journals such as Science in Context, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Synthese, Communications of the ACM and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact