Thomas Round

1.1k citations
45 papers · 844 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 8
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 4
    • Primary Care and Health Outcomes 5
    • Healthcare cost, quality, practices 2

Thomas Round

38 papers receiving 829 citations

Peers

Thomas Round
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Family Practice 59
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 55
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Oncology 172
  • Health Information Management 27
Replace Diana L. Brixner with:
Diana L. Brixner United States
Thanya Pathirana Australia
Gaston Arnolda Australia
Hye-Young Kwon South Korea
Sergio Fernández‐Bertolín Spain
Adina S. Weinerman Canada
Samuel U Takvorian United States
Alyssa M. Yeager United States
Gordon Mosser United States
Marcin Czech Poland
Thomas Round relative to Diana L. Brixner United States Diana L. Brixner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Diana L. Brixner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Round

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Round's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Round with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Round more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Round

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Round. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Round. The network helps show where Thomas Round may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Round, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Round Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Round links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014131
2 201587
3 201776
4 201469
5 202056
6 201640
7 202135
8 201832
9 202132
10 201428
11 201426
12 201325
13 202123
14 201621
15 201819
16 201818
17 201715
18 202213
19 201711
20 201710

About Thomas Round

Thomas Round is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Family Practice and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 45 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (59 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (55 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations), Oncology (172 citations) and Health Information Management (27 citations). Thomas Round has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sri Lanka and United States. Frequent co-authors include Olga Kostopoulou, Henrik Møller, Mark J. Ashworth, Carolynn Gildea, Miroslav Sirota, Brendan C. Delaney, Peter Vedsted, Greg P Rubin, David Meechan and Veline L’Esperance. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Thorax, BMJ Open, Health Psychology and The Lancet Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact