Thomas Round
Impact in
- Family Practice top 5%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Papers in
- Oncology 9
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 6
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 3
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- Olga Kostopoulou (4 shared papers)Henrik Møller (5 shared papers)Miroslav Sirota (3 shared papers)Carolynn Gildea (5 shared papers)Mark Ashworth (5 shared papers)Brendan Delaney (3 shared papers)Peter Vedsted (2 shared papers)Greg Rubin (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of General Practice (13 papers)Thorax (3 papers)The Lancet Oncology (2 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)British Journal of Cancer (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSri LankaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Round
33 papers receiving 708 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Family Practice 50
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 50
- Health Informatics 11
- Oncology 133
- Health Information Management 21
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Round
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Round's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Round with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Round more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Round
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Round. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Round. The network helps show where Thomas Round may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Round, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 113 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 50 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 9 |
About Thomas Round
Thomas Round is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (50 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (50 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), Oncology (133 citations) and Health Information Management (21 citations). Thomas Round has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sri Lanka and United States. Frequent co-authors include Olga Kostopoulou, Henrik Møller, Miroslav Sirota, Carolynn Gildea, Mark Ashworth, Brendan Delaney, Peter Vedsted, Greg Rubin, David Meechan and Abdel Douiri. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Thorax, The Lancet Oncology, BMJ Open and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.