Prooftexts
Impact in
- Religious studies top 10%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
-
- American Jewish Fiction Analysis
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 66
-
- American Jewish Fiction Analysis 24
In The Last Decade
Prooftexts
135 papers receiving 236 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Religious studies 111
- Literature and Literary Theory 112
- Archeology 77
- Sociology and Political Science 280
- Philosophy 62
Countries where authors publish in Prooftexts
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Prooftexts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Prooftexts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prooftexts more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Prooftexts
This network shows the impact of papers published in Prooftexts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Prooftexts.
About Prooftexts
The 322 papers published in Prooftexts in the last decades have received a total of 482 indexed citations . Papers published in Prooftexts usually cover Religious studies (70 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (67 papers), Archeology (45 papers), Sociology and Political Science (195 papers) and Philosophy (39 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (138 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (66 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (40 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (32 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (31 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (31 papers), American Jewish Fiction Analysis (24 papers) and Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Prooftexts are Michael P. Kramer, David G. Roskies, Sara R. Horowitz, D. Kramer, Hana Wirth-Nesher, Don Seeman, Steven G. Kellman, Ishay Rosen-Zvi, Kawashima and David Stern.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.