Comparative Literature Studies

882 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 882 papers published in Comparative Literature Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Comparative Literature Studies usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (276 papers), Sociology and Political Science (196 papers) and Cultural Studies (91 papers) specifically the topics of Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (73 papers), Japanese History and Culture (44 papers) and Translation Studies and Practices (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Literature Studies are David Damrosch, Thomas O. Beebee, Daniel Williams, Djelal Kadir, Ross Posnock, Stephen Owen, Ning Wang, Sophia A. McClennen, Eugene Chen Eoyang and Karyn Ball.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Comparative Literature Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Literature Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Literature Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Comparative Literature Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Literature Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Literature Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Literature Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025