The German Quarterly

3.5k papers and 11.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in The German Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations. Papers published in The German Quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (1.6k papers), Classics (499 papers) and History (461 papers) specifically the topics of German Literature and Culture Studies (1.3k papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (475 papers) and Literature and Cultural Memory (464 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The German Quarterly are Susan Buck‐Morss, Niklas Luhmann, Andreas Huyssen, Sabine von Dirke, David H. Miles, Robert Young, Alan Wilde, James Hardin, Dorrit Cohn and Sander L. Gilman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The German Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The German Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The German Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in The German Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The German Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The German Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The German Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025