Thomas M. Powers

619 citations
15 papers · 298 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
    • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
    • Free Will and Agency

Papers in

Thomas M. Powers

13 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Thomas M. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Safety Research 156
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 125
  • Social Psychology 60
  • General Decision Sciences 5
  • Artificial Intelligence 81
Replace Maaike Harbers with:
Maaike Harbers Netherlands
Sophie J. Nightingale United Kingdom
Blay Whitby United Kingdom
Anton Kunnari Finland
Qian Pan United States
Frédéric Dandurand Canada
Jinhan Choi South Korea
Sungwoo Lee South Korea
Janne Kauttonen Finland
Tobias Huber Germany
Thomas M. Powers relative to Maaike Harbers Netherlands Maaike Harbers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Maaike Harbers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Powers. The network helps show where Thomas M. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Powers Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200689
2 202051
3 200350
4 200530
5 201318
6 202114
7 201112
8 202110
9 201710
10
Machines and moral reasoning
20094
11
From Kant to Weber : freedom and culture in classical German social theory
19994
12 20153
13 20191
14
Ethics and technology: a program for future research
20091
15 20131

About Thomas M. Powers

Thomas M. Powers is a scholar working on Safety Research, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 15 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (7 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers), Nanotechnology research and applications (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (1 paper) and Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (156 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (125 citations), Social Psychology (60 citations), General Decision Sciences (5 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (81 citations). Thomas M. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Deborah G. Johnson, Suzanne Tolmeijer, Astrid Weiss, Felix Lindner, Myrthe L. Tielman, Marc Hanheide, Clare Dixon, S. İsmat Shah, Pamela Robinson and Nicholas G. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Ethics and Information Technology, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Intelligent Systems, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact