Jeff Behrends
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Safety Research top 5%
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Papers in
-
- Free Will and Agency 3
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 2
-
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 3
- Co-authors
- Jim Waldo (1 shared paper)Lily Hu (1 shared paper)Kate Vredenburgh (1 shared paper)Barbara J. Grosz (1 shared paper)A. John Simmons (1 shared paper)John Basl (2 shared papers)Gina Schouten (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (1 paper)Pacific philosophical quarterly (1 paper)Communications of the ACM (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Jeff Behrends
10 papers receiving 217 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Health Informatics 24
- Safety Research 111
- Computer Science Applications 36
- Information Systems and Management 42
- Philosophy 48
Countries citing papers authored by Jeff Behrends
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff Behrends's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff Behrends with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff Behrends more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff Behrends
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff Behrends. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff Behrends. The network helps show where Jeff Behrends may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jeff Behrends, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 158 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 8 | Why Everyone Has It Wrong about the Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles | 2019 | 6 |
| 9 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 0 |
About Jeff Behrends
Jeff Behrends is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Safety Research, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (1 paper) and Cryptography and Data Security (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (24 citations), Safety Research (111 citations), Computer Science Applications (36 citations), Information Systems and Management (42 citations) and Philosophy (48 citations). Jeff Behrends has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jim Waldo, Lily Hu, Kate Vredenburgh, Barbara J. Grosz, A. John Simmons, John Basl and Gina Schouten. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Pacific philosophical quarterly and Communications of the ACM.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.