Jeff Behrends
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Safety Research top 5%
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Papers in
-
- Free Will and Agency 3
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations 2
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 2
-
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI 4
- Co-authors
- Lily Hu (1 shared paper)Barbara J. Grosz (1 shared paper)A. John Simmons (1 shared paper)Jim Waldo (1 shared paper)Kate Vredenburgh (1 shared paper)John Basl (3 shared papers)Gina Schouten (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Communications of the ACM (1 paper)Pacific philosophical quarterly (1 paper)Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (1 paper)Canadian Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Jeff Behrends
11 papers receiving 258 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Health Informatics 28
- Safety Research 125
- Computer Science Applications 39
- Information Systems and Management 48
- Philosophy 66
Countries citing papers authored by Jeff Behrends
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff Behrends's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff Behrends with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff Behrends more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff Behrends
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff Behrends. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff Behrends. The network helps show where Jeff Behrends may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jeff Behrends, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 181 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 8 | Why Everyone Has It Wrong about the Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles | 2019 | 7 |
| 9 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 2 |
About Jeff Behrends
Jeff Behrends is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning (2 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (28 citations), Safety Research (125 citations), Computer Science Applications (39 citations), Information Systems and Management (48 citations) and Philosophy (66 citations). Jeff Behrends has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Lily Hu, Barbara J. Grosz, A. John Simmons, Jim Waldo, Kate Vredenburgh, John Basl and Gina Schouten. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Communications of the ACM, Pacific philosophical quarterly, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice and Canadian Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.