Thomas Liebe
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Treatment of Major Depression
Papers in
-
- Treatment of Major Depression 6
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 5
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
- Co-authors
- Martin Walter (11 shared papers)Lejla Čolić (8 shared papers)Meng Li (5 shared papers)Jörn Kaufmann (6 shared papers)Martin Skalej (2 shared papers)Marie Woelfer (4 shared papers)Moritz Kretzschmar (5 shared papers)Björn H. Schott (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Human Brain Mapping (3 papers)The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2 papers)NeuroImage Clinical (1 paper)The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry (1 paper)Translational Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas Liebe
13 papers receiving 274 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Biological Psychiatry 54
- Pharmacology 93
- Cognitive Neuroscience 100
- Behavioral Neuroscience 16
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 53
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Liebe
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Liebe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Liebe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Liebe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Liebe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Liebe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Liebe. The network helps show where Thomas Liebe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Liebe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 49 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 0 |
About Thomas Liebe
Thomas Liebe is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biological Psychiatry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (1 paper) and Barrier Structure and Function Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (54 citations), Pharmacology (93 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (100 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (16 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (53 citations). Thomas Liebe has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martin Walter, Lejla Čolić, Meng Li, Jörn Kaufmann, Martin Skalej, Marie Woelfer, Moritz Kretzschmar, Björn H. Schott, Catherine M. Sweeney‐Reed and Gusalija Behnisch. Their work appears in journals such as Human Brain Mapping, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, NeuroImage Clinical, The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry and Translational Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.