Thomas Licher

403 citations
12 papers · 141 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Licher

10 papers receiving 138 citations

Peers

Thomas Licher
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Sensory Systems 31
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 32
  • Electrochemistry 8
  • Biochemistry 7
  • Molecular Biology 79
Replace Victoria J. Barrett with:
Victoria J. Barrett United Kingdom
Dana Cucu Romania
Valerie S. Morrison United Kingdom
Brian A. Droz United States
Samuel Usher United Kingdom
X. H. Liang China
Anil Noronha Antony United States
Daniel S. Matasic United States
Jan Christian Reil Germany
Fenja Knoepp Germany
Thomas Licher relative to Victoria J. Barrett United Kingdom Victoria J. Barrett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Victoria J. Barrett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Licher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Licher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Licher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Licher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Licher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Licher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Licher. The network helps show where Thomas Licher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Licher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Licher Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Licher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201238
2 200335
3 200612
4 202211
5 200411
6 20239
7 20218
8 20167
9 20136
10 20234
11 20240
12 20250

About Thomas Licher

Thomas Licher is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Spectroscopy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 141 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1 paper), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (1 paper) and Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (31 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (32 citations), Electrochemistry (8 citations), Biochemistry (7 citations) and Molecular Biology (79 citations). Thomas Licher has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Olaf Pongs, Patrick Friederich, Carsten Strübing, Heinz‐Werner Kleemann, Thorsten Schmidt, Hartmut Rütten, Werner Dittrich, Matthias Löhn, Felix Bärenz and Thomas Maier. Their work appears in journals such as SLAS DISCOVERY, Assay and Drug Development Technologies, Anesthesia & Analgesia, ACS Catalysis and Current Protocols.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact