Thomas Leistner

23 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Thomas Leistner
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
  • Applied Mathematics 289
  • Geometry and Topology 237
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 214
  • Mathematical Physics 68
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 94
Replace Vestislav Apostolov with:
Vestislav Apostolov Canada
Toshiki Mabuchi Japan
Jan Metzger Germany
Ahmed Zériahi France
René Reinbacher United States
Hagen Triendl Germany
Claudius Klare France
Oisín A. P. Mac Conamhna United Kingdom
Paul-Konstantin Oehlmann United States
Mikhail Aleksandrovich Bershtein Russia
Thomas Leistner relative to Vestislav Apostolov Canada Vestislav Apostolov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Vestislav Apostolov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Leistner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Leistner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Leistner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Leistner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Leistner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Leistner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Leistner. The network helps show where Thomas Leistner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Leistner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Leistner Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Leistner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200746
2 200939
3 200637
4 201526
5 200525
6 201024
7 200817
8
Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy and parallel spinors
200216
9 201416
10 200815
11 201013
12 201611
13 201210
14 20159
15 20119
16 20077
17 20107
18 20176
19 20106
20 20185

About Thomas Leistner

Thomas Leistner is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Mathematical Physics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (27 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (21 papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (17 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (5 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (4 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (289 citations), Geometry and Topology (237 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (214 citations), Mathematical Physics (68 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (94 citations). Thomas Leistner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Anton Sergeevich Galaev, Paweł Nurowski, Helga Baum, Vicente Cortés, Dmitri V. Alekseevsky, Michael Eastwood, Antonio J. Di Scala, Stuart Armstrong, Anna Fino and Ian Muir Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Differential Geometry and its Applications, Journal of Geometry and Physics, Journal of Differential Geometry, ANNALI SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE - CLASSE DI SCIENZE and Geometriae Dedicata.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact