Helga Baum

1.1k citations
22 papers · 565 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Helga Baum

22 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Helga Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Applied Mathematics 399
  • Geometry and Topology 303
  • Mathematical Physics 185
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 261
  • Algebra and Number Theory 49
Replace Ines Kath with:
Ines Kath Germany
Uwe Semmelmann Germany
Paweł Nurowski Poland
Oussama Hijazi France
Naichung Conan Leung Hong Kong
Stefan Ivanov Bulgaria
Krzysztof Galicki United States
Stephen M. Paneitz United States
Mu‐Tao Wang United States
Nicolas Ginoux Germany
Helga Baum relative to Ines Kath Germany Ines Kath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ines Kath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helga Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helga Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helga Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helga Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helga Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helga Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helga Baum. The network helps show where Helga Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Helga Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helga Baum Line = papers co-authored together Helga Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Twistors and killing spinors on Riemannian manifolds
1991167
2 200863
3 198957
4
Spin-Strukturen und Dirac-Operatoren über pseudoriemannschen Mannigfaltigkeiten
198146
5 199123
6 200423
7 198922
8 199919
9 201019
10 199919
11 201017
12 201414
13 200313
14
TWISTOR AND KILLING SPINORS IN LORENTZIAN GEOMETRY
200010
15 20079
16 20008
17 20148
18 20157
19 19947
20 19966

About Helga Baum

Helga Baum is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (14 papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (9 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (8 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (8 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (3 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (3 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (2 papers) and Advanced Operator Algebra Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (399 citations), Geometry and Topology (303 citations), Mathematical Physics (185 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (261 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (49 citations). Helga Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Ines Kath, Thomas Friedrich, Ralf Grunewald, Dmitri V. Alekseevsky, Andreas Juhl, Thomas Leistner and Olaf Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry, Mathematische Zeitschrift, Differential Geometry and its Applications, Journal of Geometry and Physics and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact