Thomas Lauer

87 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thomas Lauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Ophthalmology 150
  • Information Systems and Management 102
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 133
  • General Decision Sciences 21
  • Management Information Systems 103
Replace William H. Ross with:
William H. Ross United States
Jukka Luoma Finland
David Gal United States
Yong‐Mi Kim United States
Karim Jamal Canada
Patrick Butler Australia
Peter Hamilton United Kingdom
Imran Mahmud Bangladesh
Celene Grayson United Kingdom
R H Grey United Kingdom
Thomas Lauer relative to William H. Ross United States William H. Ross's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
William H. Ross · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lauer. The network helps show where Thomas Lauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Lauer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Lauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007136
2 2007107
3 2011107
4 200899
5 200792
6 200969
7 202043
8 201339
9 201434
10 198932
11 201331
12 201929
13 201126
14 200126
15 202026
16 200022
17 201122
18 199922
19 200420
20 200019

About Thomas Lauer

Thomas Lauer is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science and Management Information Systems, having authored 101 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Management and Leadership (12 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (12 papers), Corporate Governance and Management (12 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (5 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (4 papers) and Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (150 citations), Information Systems and Management (102 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (133 citations), General Decision Sciences (21 citations) and Management Information Systems (103 citations). Thomas Lauer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Xiaodong Deng, Peter A. Campochiaro, Sean F. Hackett, Enid Neptune, Sharon A. McGrath‐Morrow, Anna Sick-Samuels, Zhihao Wu, Karl D. Majeske, Megan Podowski and Gerald V. Post. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Journal of Information Technology, Experimental Lung Research, Antioxidants and Redox Signaling and Business Process Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact