David Gal

78 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

David Gal
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • General Decision Sciences 137
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 398
  • Reproductive Medicine 325
  • Marketing 346
  • Applied Psychology 178
Replace Andrew R. Davidson with:
Andrew R. Davidson United States
Sharma Sc India
Andreas Hackethal Germany
David A. Savage United Kingdom
Jooyoung Kim South Korea
Ira Horowitz United States
Anne Marie McCarthy United States
Eun‐Ju Lee South Korea
Bruce Richardson United States
Neeraj Arora United States
David Gal relative to Andrew R. Davidson United States Andrew R. Davidson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Andrew R. Davidson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Gal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Gal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Gal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gal. The network helps show where David Gal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Gal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Gal Line = papers co-authored together David Gal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010204
2 2020163
3 1981114
4 2014109
5 1981108
6 2006104
7 1987102
8 1998100
9 201799
10 201985
11 199169
12 199167
13
Isolation of a novel gene, TSP50, by a hypomethylated DNA fragment in human breast cancer.
199958
14 201258
15 198250
16 199249
17
Effect of cell density and confluency on cholesterol metabolism in cancer cells in monolayer culture.
198149
18 201549
19 201048
20 201148

About David Gal

David Gal is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Applied Psychology, Reproductive Medicine and Social Psychology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (8 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (8 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (7 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (7 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (137 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (398 citations), Reproductive Medicine (325 citations), Marketing (346 citations) and Applied Psychology (178 citations). David Gal has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Blakeley B. McShane, Alexander Chernev, Paul C. MacDonald, Evan R. Simpson, Derek D. Rucker, John C. Porter, M.L. Tancer, Kartik Kalaignanam, Fernando O. Recio and Kapil R. Tuli. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Journal of Marketing Research and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact