Thomas J. Woltering

33 papers receiving 978 citations

Peers

Thomas J. Woltering
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 526
  • Biological Psychiatry 34
  • Organic Chemistry 323
  • Molecular Biology 603
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 108
Replace Michael Bös with:
Michael Bös Switzerland
Christophe Plisson United Kingdom
Pascal George France
Samuel Hintermann Switzerland
Hyekyung P. Cho United States
Raymond G. Booth United States
T. G. Murali Dhar United States
Dianne Kowal United States
Jacob B. Schwarz United States
Curt A. Dvorak United States
Thomas J. Woltering relative to Michael Bös Switzerland Michael Bös's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Michael Bös · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Woltering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Woltering's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Woltering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Woltering more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Woltering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Woltering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Woltering. The network helps show where Thomas J. Woltering may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas J. Woltering, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas J. Woltering Line = papers co-authored together Thomas J. Woltering links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004142
2 201680
3 199877
4 199971
5 200063
6 200548
7 201343
8 201141
9 199634
10 201032
11 199631
12 199629
13 199829
14 201229
15 200225
16 199523
17 199922
18 200721
19 201420
20 199919

About Thomas J. Woltering

Thomas J. Woltering is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (17 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (9 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers), Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (5 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (5 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (5 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (4 papers) and Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (526 citations), Biological Psychiatry (34 citations), Organic Chemistry (323 citations), Molecular Biology (603 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (108 citations). Thomas J. Woltering has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Mutel, Geo Adam, Jürgen Wichmann, John A. Kemp, John Richards, Theresa M. Ballard, Chi‐Huey Wong, Gabriele Weitz‐Schmidt, Heinz Stadler and Silvia Gatti. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Neuropharmacology, Tetrahedron Letters, ChemMedChem and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact