Thomas J. Pingel
Impact in
- Geology top 2%
- 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
- Space and Planetary Science top 2%
Papers in
-
- Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications 11
-
- Flood Risk Assessment and Management 6
- Co-authors
- Keith Clarke (4 shared papers)William A. McBride (1 shared paper)Walker S. Ashley (6 shared papers)Stephen M. Strader (4 shared papers)Hugo A. Loáiciga (2 shared papers)Alex M. Haberlie (1 shared paper)Andrew J. Krmenec (3 shared papers)Anabel Ford (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Remote Sensing (4 papers)Cartography and Geographic Information Science (3 papers)Natural Hazards (2 papers)GeoHealth (1 paper)Geographical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyBrazil
In The Last Decade
Thomas J. Pingel
35 papers receiving 855 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Geology 240
- Space and Planetary Science 44
- Environmental Engineering 469
- Global and Planetary Change 257
- Geochemistry and Petrology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Pingel
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Pingel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Pingel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Pingel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Pingel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Pingel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Pingel. The network helps show where Thomas J. Pingel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas J. Pingel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 296 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 50 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 6 |
About Thomas J. Pingel
Thomas J. Pingel is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Atmospheric Science and Geology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 873 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (11 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (7 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (6 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (6 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (4 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (3 papers), Geography Education and Pedagogy (3 papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geology (240 citations), Space and Planetary Science (44 citations), Environmental Engineering (469 citations), Global and Planetary Change (257 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (64 citations). Thomas J. Pingel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Keith Clarke, William A. McBride, Walker S. Ashley, Stephen M. Strader, Hugo A. Loáiciga, Alex M. Haberlie, Andrew J. Krmenec, Anabel Ford, Theodore Lim and Bev Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Remote Sensing, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Natural Hazards, GeoHealth and Geographical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.