Natural Hazards

8.6k papers and 200.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.6k papers published in Natural Hazards in the last decades have received a total of 200.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Natural Hazards usually cover Global and Planetary Change (3.7k papers), Atmospheric Science (2.4k papers) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Flood Risk Assessment and Management (2.3k papers), Landslides and related hazards (1.6k papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Natural Hazards are Sebastiaan N. Jonkman, Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, Fikret Berkes, Biswajeet Pradhan, Susan L. Cutter, Dieter Rickenmann, Eric Tate, Andrea G. Fabbri, Chang–Jo F. Chung and Torsten Grothmann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Natural Hazards

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Hazards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Hazards.

Countries where authors publish in Natural Hazards

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Hazards. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Hazards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Hazards more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025