Thomas Isaac

25 papers receiving 952 citations

Peers

Thomas Isaac
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Health Information Management 208
  • Family Practice 61
  • Medical Terminology 7
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 76
  • General Health Professions 248
Replace Anuj K. Dalal with:
Anuj K. Dalal United States
Steven M. Ornstein United States
Saverio M. Maviglia United States
Michael T. Rupp United States
Ana L. Hincapie United States
David W. Bates United States
T. Donald Rucker United States
Nidhi Shah United States
Janice L. Kwan Canada
Lisha Lo Canada
Thomas Isaac relative to Anuj K. Dalal United States Anuj K. Dalal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anuj K. Dalal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Isaac

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Isaac's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Isaac with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Isaac more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Isaac

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Isaac. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Isaac. The network helps show where Thomas Isaac may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Isaac, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Isaac Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Isaac links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010259
2 2009240
3 201179
4 200973
5 200956
6 201055
7 200842
8 201625
9 201120
10 200418
11 202117
12 201915
13 202014
14 201212
15 202012
16
Measuring overuse with electronic health records data.
201811
17 202110
18 20128
19 20107
20
Patients' views of a behavioral intervention including financial incentives.
20176

About Thomas Isaac

Thomas Isaac is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Family Practice, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (7 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (208 citations), Family Practice (61 citations), Medical Terminology (7 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (76 citations) and General Health Professions (248 citations). Thomas Isaac has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bruce E. Landon, Alan M. Zaslavsky, Paul D. Cleary, Ashish K. Jha, Saul N. Weingart, Michael P. Massagli, Daniel Z. Sands, Joel S. Weissman, Roger B. Davis and Jie Zheng. Their work appears in journals such as American Heart Journal, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Health Services Research, Pain Research and Management and American Journal of Medical Quality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact