Thomas Hempel

1.7k citations
60 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Hempel

57 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Thomas Hempel
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.0k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 581
  • Mechanics of Materials 366
  • Materials Chemistry 690
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 563
Replace M. A. Py with:
M. A. Py Switzerland
Masahito Yamaguchi Japan
V. Kuryatkov United States
J.M. Tsai Taiwan
Krishnan Balakrishnan Japan
A. Chitnis United States
Jeffrey J. Figiel United States
Xu‐Qiang Shen Japan
A. Kasic Germany
V.P. Kladko Ukraine
Thomas Hempel relative to M. A. Py Switzerland M. A. Py's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
M. A. Py · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hempel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hempel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hempel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hempel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hempel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hempel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hempel. The network helps show where Thomas Hempel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hempel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hempel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hempel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007118
2 2007112
3 2003107
4 2004101
5 200394
6 200674
7 200674
8 200769
9 200768
10 201157
11 200437
12 200735
13 200434
14 200934
15 199330
16 200629
17 200627
18 200923
19 201423
20 201222

About Thomas Hempel

Thomas Hempel is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (38 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (19 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (15 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (12 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (12 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (9 papers), ZnO doping and properties (9 papers) and Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.0k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (581 citations), Mechanics of Materials (366 citations), Materials Chemistry (690 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (563 citations). Thomas Hempel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Russia. Frequent co-authors include A. Krost, A. Dadgar, J. Bläsing, J. Christen, A. Diez, J. Christen, Peter Veit, A. Krtschil, F. Bertram and F. Schulze. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Crystal Growth, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Thin Solid Films and physica status solidi (b).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact