Thomas Hardie
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 4
- Co-authors
- David Baron (5 shared papers)Howard B. Moss (6 shared papers)Paula Klemm (4 shared papers)Kevin G. Lynch (4 shared papers)Barbara Ott (3 shared papers)Ellen M. Volpe (3 shared papers)Janet A. Deatrick (10 shared papers)Catherine Cerulli (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Oncology nursing forum (4 papers)Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing (3 papers)Journal of Transcultural Nursing (3 papers)Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (2 papers)Nursing Outlook (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas Hardie
58 papers receiving 966 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Biological Psychiatry 29
- Behavioral Neuroscience 39
- Health 78
- Research and Theory 8
- Clinical Psychology 188
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hardie
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hardie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hardie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hardie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hardie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hardie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hardie. The network helps show where Thomas Hardie may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hardie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 68 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 38 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 27 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 21 |
About Thomas Hardie
Thomas Hardie is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Epidemiology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (29 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (39 citations), Health (78 citations), Research and Theory (8 citations) and Clinical Psychology (188 citations). Thomas Hardie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David Baron, Howard B. Moss, Paula Klemm, Kevin G. Lynch, Barbara Ott, Ellen M. Volpe, Janet A. Deatrick, Catherine Cerulli, Wendy L. Hobbie and Lamia P. Barakat. Their work appears in journals such as Oncology nursing forum, Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, Journal of Transcultural Nursing, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing and Nursing Outlook.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.