Kate Collie
Impact in
- Conservation top 0.2%
- Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Oncology top 5%
- Cancer survivorship and care
Papers in
- Conservation 12
- Art Therapy and Mental Health 12
- Oncology 12
- Cancer survivorship and care 12
- Co-authors
- David Spiegel (4 shared papers)Bonita C. Long (4 shared papers)Janine Giese‐Davis (4 shared papers)Kate M. Rancourt (1 shared paper)Eric Neri (1 shared paper)Helena C. Kraemer (1 shared paper)Joan L. Bottorff (2 shared papers)Cheryl Koopman (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psycho-Oncology (3 papers)Qualitative Health Research (2 papers)Journal of Health Psychology (2 papers)Art Therapy (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Kate Collie
27 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Conservation 326
- Oncology 417
- Biological Psychiatry 30
- Applied Psychology 55
- Social Psychology 225
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Collie
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Collie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Collie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Collie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Collie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Collie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Collie. The network helps show where Kate Collie may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Collie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 353 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 142 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 125 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 108 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 76 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 58 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 28 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 13 |
About Kate Collie
Kate Collie is a scholar working on Conservation, Oncology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (12 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (12 papers), Music Therapy and Health (5 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (326 citations), Oncology (417 citations), Biological Psychiatry (30 citations), Applied Psychology (55 citations) and Social Psychology (225 citations). Kate Collie has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include David Spiegel, Bonita C. Long, Janine Giese‐Davis, Kate M. Rancourt, Eric Neri, Helena C. Kraemer, Joan L. Bottorff, Cheryl Koopman, Cathy A. Malchiodi and Davor Čubranić. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, Qualitative Health Research, Journal of Health Psychology, Art Therapy and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.