Thomas Gray

28 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Thomas Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • General Psychology 16
  • General Decision Sciences 19
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 97
  • Social Psychology 89
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 72
Replace George Deane with:
George Deane United Kingdom
Michael Snodgrass United States
Jaques Kaswan United States
Kenneth P. Monteiro United States
Robert C. Beck United States
Steven G. Barta United States
Isabel M. Birnbaum United States
Neil I. Wiener Canada
Geoffrey H. Blowers Hong Kong
Nerissa Siu Ping Ho United Kingdom
Thomas Gray relative to George Deane United Kingdom George Deane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
George Deane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gray. The network helps show where Thomas Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Gray Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198095
2 198553
3 199038
4 197319
5 199419
6
The poems of Thomas Gray, William Collins, Oliver Goldsmith;
196918
7 197612
8 197511
9
Thomas Gray and William Collins: Poetical Works
197710
10 19908
11 19666
12 19945
13
An elegy wrote in a country church yard
20014
14 19784
15
The Poetical Works of Thomas Gray
20074
16 19794
17 19913
18 19923
19 20183
20
Selected poems of Thomas Gray and William Collins
19672

About Thomas Gray

Thomas Gray is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Anthropology, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (5 papers), Medical History and Innovations (2 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (16 citations), General Decision Sciences (19 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (97 citations), Social Psychology (89 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (72 citations). Thomas Gray has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roy A. Wise, William Collins, Roger Lonsdale, David R. Mandel, Oliver Goldsmith, Joanne L. Miller, Alan B. Rubens, Charles Speaks, Arthur Johnston and Joseph Wood Krutch. Their work appears in journals such as Learning and Motivation, Medical History, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact