Robert C. Beck

30 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Robert C. Beck
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • General Decision Sciences 100
  • Applied Psychology 73
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 35
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 37
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 65
Replace Mitchell M. Berkun with:
Mitchell M. Berkun United States
Adam T. Brewer United States
Jorge H. Daruna United States
Mitchell L. Schare United States
George Deane United Kingdom
Charles N. Uhl United States
John R. Smethells United States
Benjamin P. Kowal United States
Susanna Weber Switzerland
Todd L. McKerchar United States
Robert C. Beck relative to Mitchell M. Berkun United States Mitchell M. Berkun's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Mitchell M. Berkun · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Beck. The network helps show where Robert C. Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. Beck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert C. Beck Line = papers co-authored together Robert C. Beck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009140
2 196143
3 196234
4 197932
5 196022
6 197220
7 196615
8 196515
9 199514
10 197113
11 196312
12 196712
13 19697
14 19746
15 19735
16 19675
17 19884
18 19624
19 19654
20 19674

About Robert C. Beck

Robert C. Beck is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Behavioral Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 35 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (100 citations), Applied Psychology (73 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (35 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (37 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (65 citations). Robert C. Beck has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Toni Falbo, Lawrence I. O’Kelly, Richard F. Nash, Wendy L. McBee, Steven R. Hursh, Charles I. Brooks, John E. Williams, Lisa K. McDaniel, William R. Phillips and Carolyn J. Simmons. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Reports, The Journal of Experimental Education, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology and Journal of Personality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact