George Deane

827 citations
18 papers · 395 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

George Deane

17 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

George Deane
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 186
  • General Psychology 11
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 30
  • General Decision Sciences 13
Replace Otello Desiderato with:
Otello Desiderato United States
Anna Thorwart Germany
Takahiro Osumi Japan
Geoffrey H. Blowers Hong Kong
Joana B. Vieira Portugal
Sally G. Cox United Kingdom
Amanda C. Marshall Germany
Rosalie P. Kern United States
Vita Droutman United States
Stefanie Maier Germany
George Deane relative to Otello Desiderato United States Otello Desiderato's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Otello Desiderato · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Deane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Deane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Deane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Deane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Deane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Deane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Deane. The network helps show where George Deane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Deane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Deane Line = papers co-authored together George Deane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 196170
2 195440
3 196938
4 202036
5 202035
6 197025
7 195824
8 202024
9 196422
10 196319
11 202116
12 202213
13 196612
14 196510
15 20245
16 19654
17 20222
18 20250

About George Deane

George Deane is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 18 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (186 citations), General Psychology (11 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (30 citations) and General Decision Sciences (13 citations). George Deane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Zeaman, Mark Miller, Sam Wilkinson, Andy Clark, Mark Miller, Peter J. Donovick, Guillaume Dumas, Jonathan Simon, Axel Constant and Guillaume Lajoie. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience of Consciousness, Physiology & Behavior, Artificial Life, Trends in Cognitive Sciences and Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact