Thomas E. Williams

2.2k citations
33 papers · 461 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas E. Williams

31 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 357
  • Neurology 18
  • Neurology 23
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 15
  • Sensory Systems 4
Replace Petra Lelková with:
Petra Lelková Czechia
Alessandra Mattioda Italy
Andrea Lazzarotto Italy
Iuliana Achiti France
Arabella Buchmann Austria
Audrey Chardain France
Francesco Antonio Losavio Italy
Grigorios Kalaitzidis United States
Friederike Held Germany
Baukje J. van der Star Netherlands
Thomas E. Williams relative to Petra Lelková Czechia Petra Lelková's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Petra Lelková · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Williams. The network helps show where Thomas E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020103
2 202067
3 202266
4 202442
5 202226
6 202225
7 201720
8 202414
9 202412
10 201510
11 20208
12 20127
13 20237
14 20237
15 20136
16 20226
17 20215
18 20224
19 20224
20 20244

About Thomas E. Williams

Thomas E. Williams is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 33 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (28 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (357 citations), Neurology (18 citations), Neurology (23 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (15 citations) and Sensory Systems (4 citations). Thomas E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Simon Jeremy Chataway, Henrik Zetterberg, Anisha Doshi, Ruth Ann Marrie, Daniel Ontaneda, Vivien Li, Carmen Tur, Robert J. Fox, Nevin Alex John and Frederik Barkhof. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Neurology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Brain and Behavior, The Lancet Neurology and Multiple Sclerosis Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact