Anisha Doshi

26 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

Anisha Doshi
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 233
  • Biological Psychiatry 19
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 44
  • Neurology 80
  • Neurology 43
Replace Ana Cavey with:
Ana Cavey United Kingdom
Noemi Pasquarelli Germany
Erik Ellwardt Germany
M M Esiri United Kingdom
Simon Heales United Kingdom
Cathy Jensen Belgium
Carlos Nogueras‐Ortiz United States
Paula Hoffman United States
Marina Ziehn United States
K Janssen Germany
Anisha Doshi relative to Ana Cavey United Kingdom Ana Cavey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Ana Cavey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anisha Doshi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anisha Doshi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anisha Doshi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anisha Doshi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anisha Doshi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anisha Doshi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anisha Doshi. The network helps show where Anisha Doshi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anisha Doshi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anisha Doshi Line = papers co-authored together Anisha Doshi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016153
2 2017133
3 201499
4 201629
5 202221
6 202118
7 202111
8 202011
9 20138
10 20236
11 20235
12 20244
13 20223
14 20163
15 20242
16 20122
17 20192
18
Optical coherence tomography in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a baseline data report from the MS-SMART trial
20162
19 20221
20 20241

About Anisha Doshi

Anisha Doshi is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Rheumatology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (22 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (2 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (2 papers) and Viral Infections and Immunology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (233 citations), Biological Psychiatry (19 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (44 citations), Neurology (80 citations) and Neurology (43 citations). Anisha Doshi has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Chataway, Chris Frost, Floriana De Angelis, Thomas T. Warner, Edina Silajdžić, Hilary Watt, Nathan R. Hill, Domenico Plantone, Peter C. Hindmarsh and Maria Björkqvist. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Clinical Medicine, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and European Journal of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact