Jonathan Stutters

934 citations
28 papers · 597 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Stutters

27 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Jonathan Stutters
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 426
  • Developmental Neuroscience 9
  • Neurology 22
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 49
  • Biological Psychiatry 3
Replace Raj Kapoor with:
Raj Kapoor United Kingdom
Katja Herges Germany
Aleksandra Krajacic Canada
Julie Petit France
Marloes H. J. Hagens Netherlands
Ryan J. Bevan United Kingdom
Jennifer Panagoulias United States
Akvilė Norkutė Germany
Alena Braun Germany
Adam Kalina Czechia
Jonathan Stutters relative to Raj Kapoor United Kingdom Raj Kapoor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Raj Kapoor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Stutters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Stutters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Stutters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Stutters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Stutters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Stutters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Stutters. The network helps show where Jonathan Stutters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Stutters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Stutters Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Stutters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020103
2 202178
3 202169
4 202266
5 201850
6 202246
7 202139
8 201223
9 201323
10 202018
11 202218
12 202011
13 20239
14 20237
15 20237
16 20257
17 20235
18 20253
19 20253
20
Brain and cervical spinal cord atrophy in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: results from a placebo-controlled phase III trial (INFORMS)
20152

About Jonathan Stutters

Jonathan Stutters is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 28 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (24 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (1 paper) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (426 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (9 citations), Neurology (22 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (49 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (3 citations). Jonathan Stutters has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Semir Zeki, Declan Chard, Frederik Barkhof, Claudia A. M. Gandini Wheeler‐Kingshott, Olga Ciccarelli, Carmen Tur, Ferrán Prados, Alberto Calvi, David G. MacManus and Nevin Alex John. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Neurology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, The Lancet Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and NeuroImage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact