Thomas E. Conover

27 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Conover
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Clinical Biochemistry 94
  • Biochemistry 68
  • Molecular Biology 391
  • Toxicology 19
  • Cell Biology 83
Replace R. K. Emaus with:
R. K. Emaus United States
Th. Posternak France
Frank D. Vasington United States
Carole Hall United States
Lúcia Pereira-da-Silva Brazil
Patricia M. Sokolove United States
Mary E. Kirtley United States
Archie L. Smith United States
F. Guerrieri Italy
G. Graff United States
Thomas E. Conover relative to R. K. Emaus United States R. K. Emaus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
R. K. Emaus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Conover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Conover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Conover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Conover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Conover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Conover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Conover. The network helps show where Thomas E. Conover may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Conover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Conover Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Conover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196399
2 196268
3 196753
4 198745
5 196533
6 198132
7 196332
8 196625
9 196023
10 196323
11 196322
12 196016
13 197015
14 196614
15 196913
16 196312
17 197512
18 196311
19 197011
20 19919

About Thomas E. Conover

Thomas E. Conover is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cell Biology, Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (8 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Vitamin K Research Studies (3 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (94 citations), Biochemistry (68 citations), Molecular Biology (391 citations), Toxicology (19 citations) and Cell Biology (83 citations). Thomas E. Conover has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lars Ernster, Michael Bárány, Efraim Racker, Günther Siebert, Regina Schneider, Louis H. Schliselfeld, M Goffart, Eric Gaetjens, L. L. Danielson and E. Racker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry and Trends in Biochemical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact