Thomas Docherty

1.4k citations
74 papers · 703 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Docherty

55 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

Thomas Docherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Literature and Literary Theory 201
  • Philosophy 87
  • Music 20
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 29
  • Political Science and International Relations 132
Replace Thomas Carlyle with:
Thomas Carlyle
Lawrence D. Kritzman United States
Margaret Ferguson United States
Andrew Bennett United Kingdom
Giles Gunn United States
Terence Hawkes United Kingdom
Sabah A. Salih
David R. Shumway United States
Chris Turner United Kingdom
Stephen Kern United States
Thomas Docherty relative to Thomas Carlyle Thomas Carlyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Thomas Carlyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Docherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Docherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Docherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Docherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Docherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Docherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Docherty. The network helps show where Thomas Docherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Docherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Docherty Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Docherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Postmodernism: A Reader
1992111
2 199969
3 199458
4 201150
5 201547
6 199843
7 201143
8 201643
9 200623
10 199618
11 198517
12 200416
13 198413
14 199111
15
John Donne, undone
198610
16 201610
17 199310
18 20129
19 19978
20
The English Question: Or Academic Freedoms
20087

About Thomas Docherty

Thomas Docherty is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 74 papers that have together received 703 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (3 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (3 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers), Samuel Beckett and Modernism (2 papers) and Political Theology and Sovereignty (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (201 citations), Philosophy (87 citations), Music (20 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (29 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (132 citations). Thomas Docherty has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include David Simpson, Ellen K. Feder, Ernst van Alphen, Nancy J. Holland, Ralph Flores, Horace L. Fairlamb, Wallace Martin, Christopher Braider, Seamus Heaney and Samuel Weber. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Textual Practice, Poetics Today, Comparative Literature and Comparative Critical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact