Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Literature
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Literature more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Contemporary Literature
This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Literature.
About Contemporary Literature
The 1.3k papers published in Contemporary Literature in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Contemporary Literature usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (645 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (63 papers), Music (37 papers), Philosophy (122 papers) and Cultural Studies (85 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (208 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (162 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (63 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (58 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (47 papers), Irish and British Studies (43 papers), American Jewish Fiction Analysis (43 papers) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Literature are Terry Eagleton, Toni Morrison, Rebecca L. Walkowitz, Ian Baucom, Nellie Y. McKay, Kazuo Ishiguro, Simone Murray, Mark B. N. Hansen, Ashraf H. A. Rushdy and Anne Whitehead.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.