Ralph Flores
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 0.5%
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 0.5%
- Art, Politics, and Modernism
Papers in
-
- Modernist Literature and Criticism 3
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 3
-
- Augustinian Studies and Theology 2
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 2
- Indian History and Philosophy 1
Ralph Flores
20 papers receiving 771 citations
Ralph Flores's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Literature and Literary Theory 474
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 175
- Music 106
- History 219
- Philosophy 233
Countries citing papers authored by Ralph Flores
This map shows the geographic impact of Ralph Flores's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ralph Flores with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ralph Flores more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ralph Flores
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ralph Flores. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ralph Flores. The network helps show where Ralph Flores may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ralph Flores, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Hit paper breakdown → | 1987 | 764 |
| 2 | After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism Hit paper breakdown → | 1987 | 489 |
| 3 | 1985 | 72 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 51 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 37 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 7 | |
| 14 | Buddhist Scriptures as Literature: Sacred Rhetoric and the Uses of Theory | 2008 | 7 |
| 15 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 19 | A study of allegory in its historical context and relationship to contemporary theory | 1996 | 3 |
| 20 | 1996 | 3 |
About Ralph Flores
Ralph Flores is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Modernist Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (2 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers) and Indian History and Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (474 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (175 citations), Music (106 citations), History (219 citations) and Philosophy (233 citations). Frequent co-authors include Hayden White, Andreas Huyssen, Raymond Williams, Fredric Jameson, John Sallis, Samuel Beckett, Ruby Cohn, Thomas Docherty, Allen Thiher and René Wellek. Their work appears in journals such as World Literature Today, MLN, SubStance, The German Quarterly and Augustinian Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.