Thomas Chertemps

3.5k citations
49 papers · 2.1k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Chertemps

49 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Chertemps
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Insect Science 1.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Genetics 680
  • Aging 29
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 327
Replace Benjamin J. Cook with:
Benjamin J. Cook United States
Neil Audsley United Kingdom
Sho Sakurai Japan
Chen‐Zhu Wang China
Russell A. Jurenka United States
Dalibor Kodrı́k Czechia
Jeffrey H. Spring United States
Nicolas Montagné France
Jean‐Pierre Farine France
Chih‐Ming Yin United States
Thomas Chertemps relative to Benjamin J. Cook United States Benjamin J. Cook's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
Benjamin J. Cook · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Chertemps

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Chertemps's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Chertemps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Chertemps more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Chertemps

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Chertemps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Chertemps. The network helps show where Thomas Chertemps may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Chertemps, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Chertemps Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Chertemps links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017155
2 2007132
3 2021120
4 2014117
5 200694
6 201194
7 201092
8 201489
9 201288
10 200985
11 201285
12 201273
13 201971
14 201056
15 201553
16 200651
17 201549
18 200543
19 201742
20 201938

About Thomas Chertemps

Thomas Chertemps is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (32 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (16 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (11 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (7 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (6 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (5 papers) and Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.1k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Genetics (680 citations), Aging (29 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (327 citations). Thomas Chertemps has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Martine Maı̈bèche-Coisné, Nicolas Durand, Françoise Bozzolan, Martine Maı̈bèche, Carole Labeur, Thomas Wicker, Emmanuelle Jacquin‐Joly, Line Duportets, Nicolas Montagné and David Siaussat. Their work appears in journals such as Insect Molecular Biology, PLoS ONE, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Scientific Reports and eLife.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact