Thomas Chertemps

3.6k citations
54 papers · 2.7k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Chertemps

52 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Thomas Chertemps
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Insect Science 1.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 858
  • Molecular Biology 926
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 176
  • Ecology 217
Replace Masatoshi Iga with:
Masatoshi Iga Japan
Makio Takeda Japan
Henry Chung United States
Joachim Schachtner Germany
Jeffrey C. Lord United States
Yongliang Fan China
Muhammad Tufail Japan
Dalibor Kodrı́k Czechia
Umut Toprak Türkiye
Susanne Neupert Germany
Thomas Chertemps relative to Masatoshi Iga Japan Masatoshi Iga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Masatoshi Iga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Chertemps

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Chertemps's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Chertemps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Chertemps more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Chertemps

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Chertemps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Chertemps. The network helps show where Thomas Chertemps may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Chertemps, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Chertemps Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Chertemps links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017265
2 2017261
3 2017163
4 2007132
5 2021128
6 2014117
7 200696
8 201193
9 201092
10 201491
11 201288
12 200985
13 201284
14 201273
15 201972
16 201057
17 200654
18 201553
19 201549
20 200544

About Thomas Chertemps

Thomas Chertemps is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (26 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (15 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (7 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (3 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (3 papers), Malaria Research and Control (3 papers) and Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.1k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (858 citations), Molecular Biology (926 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (176 citations) and Ecology (217 citations). Thomas Chertemps has collaborated with scholars based in France, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Martine Maı̈bèche, Nicolas Durand, Françoise Bozzolan, Carole Labeur, Claude Wicker, David Siaussat, Line Duportets, Nicolas Montagné, Emmanuelle Jacquin‐Joly and Annick Maria. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Biology, Insect Molecular Biology, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact