Insect Molecular Biology

2.0k papers and 70.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Insect Molecular Biology in the last decades have received a total of 70.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Insect Molecular Biology usually cover Insect Science (1.2k papers), Molecular Biology (1.1k papers) and Genetics (509 papers) specifically the topics of Insect Resistance and Genetics (770 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (501 papers) and Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (433 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Insect Molecular Biology are Hilary Ranson, Janet Hemingway, Frank H. Collins, Jay D. Evans, L. M. Field, William C. Black, Marjorie A. Hoy, Hugh M. Robertson, Ayyamperumal Jeyaprakash and Anthony A. James.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Insect Molecular Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Insect Molecular Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Insect Molecular Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Insect Molecular Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Insect Molecular Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Insect Molecular Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Insect Molecular Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025