Thomas C. Jackson

18 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers

Thomas C. Jackson
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Applied Psychology 57
  • Family Practice 13
  • Physiology 136
  • General Health Professions 130
  • Animal Science and Zoology 52
Replace Jan Broer with:
Jan Broer Netherlands
Sang Ah Lee South Korea
Joan Colom Spain
Evelyn L. Lewis United States
Scott F. Grey United States
Richard Madeley United Kingdom
Kamyar Arasteh United States
Elizabeth Sloand United States
Raquel B. De Boni Brazil
Ana López‐Durán Spain
Thomas C. Jackson relative to Jan Broer Netherlands Jan Broer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Jan Broer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Jackson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Jackson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Jackson. The network helps show where Thomas C. Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Jackson Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Jackson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1979268
2 200483
3 197364
4 198751
5 199537
6 199537
7 201232
8 201426
9 199522
10 198618
11 199317
12 199414
13
A comparison of the nicotine lozenge and nicotine gum: an effectiveness randomized controlled trial.
200813
14 200213
15 199310
16 19935
17 19964
18
Nuclear waste management : the ocean alternative
19812
19
Justinian's Digest, Book 20: With An English Translation And An Essay On The Law Of Mortgage In The Roman Law
20090
20
The Life of the Rev. Robert Newton, D.D
20070

About Thomas C. Jackson

Thomas C. Jackson is a scholar working on Physiology, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (1 paper), Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper) and International Environmental Law and Policies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (57 citations), Family Practice (13 citations), Physiology (136 citations), General Health Professions (130 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (52 citations). Thomas C. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin A. Safer, Timothy B. Baker, Michael C. Fiore, C. M. Kunin, David Steele, W. A. Craig, Peter G. Welling, Danielle E. McCarthy, Barry Blackwell and Mary Gutmann. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Journal of General Internal Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Academic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact