Thomas C. Hawk

2.0k citations
33 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas C. Hawk

33 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Thomas C. Hawk
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 674
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 350
  • Pharmacology 232
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 245
  • Otorhinolaryngology 52
Replace Javier Pavı́a with:
Javier Pavı́a Spain
Alexius Joe Germany
Lorcan A. O’Tuama United States
Ahmad Najafi United States
Liang Gong China
Chin‐Song Lu Taiwan
Ken Okada Japan
Brendan McDonald United Kingdom
Koichi Kaneko Japan
Thomas C. Hawk relative to Javier Pavı́a Spain Javier Pavı́a's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Javier Pavı́a · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Hawk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Hawk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Hawk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Hawk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Hawk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Hawk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Hawk. The network helps show where Thomas C. Hawk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Hawk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Hawk Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Hawk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999228
2 2000214
3 2003108
4 199781
5 200273
6 199967
7
The effects of carbidopa administration on 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa kinetics in positron emission tomography.
199267
8 200366
9 200763
10 200261
11 200856
12 200255
13 199448
14 200740
15 200240
16 200837
17 200432
18 200629
19 199226
20 201919

About Thomas C. Hawk

Thomas C. Hawk is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (674 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (350 citations), Pharmacology (232 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (245 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (52 citations). Thomas C. Hawk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Timothy G. Turkington, R. Edward Coleman, David J. Madden, James M. Provenzale, Laura L. Denny, Robert E. Coleman, James Provenzale, Lawrence R. Gottlob, Roy O. Mathew and William A. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Human Brain Mapping, American Journal of Roentgenology, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Imaging and Biology and Psychology and Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact