Thomas Bürkle

81 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas Bürkle
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Health Information Management 376
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 37
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 87
  • Toxicology 79
  • Health Informatics 21
Replace Hans‐Ulrich Prokosch with:
Hans‐Ulrich Prokosch Germany
Jürgen Stausberg Germany
Jerome A. Osheroff United States
W. Ed Hammond United States
Reza Khajouei Iran
Thomas H. Payne United States
John Glaser United States
Meryl Bloomrosen United States
Peter D. Stetson United States
Marilyn Tavenner United States
Thomas Bürkle relative to Hans‐Ulrich Prokosch Germany Hans‐Ulrich Prokosch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Hans‐Ulrich Prokosch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bürkle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bürkle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bürkle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bürkle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bürkle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bürkle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bürkle. The network helps show where Thomas Bürkle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bürkle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Bürkle Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Bürkle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003285
2 2017127
3 201368
4 200865
5 201560
6 200159
7 201456
8 200750
9 200549
10
Process mining for clinical workflows: challenges and current limitations.
200840
11 201128
12 201326
13 201324
14 199923
15 201423
16 201223
17 201419
18 201218
19 201417
20 201316

About Thomas Bürkle

Thomas Bürkle is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Artificial Intelligence and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (25 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (10 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (7 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (7 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (6 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (6 papers) and Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (376 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (37 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (87 citations), Toxicology (79 citations) and Health Informatics (21 citations). Thomas Bürkle has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Ulrich Prokosch, Elske Ammenwerth, Gabriele Herrmann, Stefan Gräber, J. König, J. Dudeck, Thorsten Posselt, Barbara Pfistermeister, Renke Maas and Harald Dormann. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Medical Informatics, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Methods of Information in Medicine and Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact