Thomas Bonk

486 citations
10 papers · 276 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • Spectroscopy top 10%
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
    • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Papers in

    • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 3
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 3
    • Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection 1

Thomas Bonk

10 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Thomas Bonk
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Spectroscopy 71
  • Molecular Biology 163
  • Cell Biology 36
  • Cancer Research 27
  • Immunology and Allergy 10
Replace Editha Bayer with:
Editha Bayer Austria
Dong‐Gi Mun United States
Anthony W. Scotto United States
Sebastian Krossa Norway
Laura Orsatti Italy
Jürgen Kirchberger Germany
Christopher A. LeClair United States
Yvonne Reinders Germany
S R Tyagi United States
Alessandra Lo Sardo Italy
Thomas Bonk relative to Editha Bayer Austria Editha Bayer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Editha Bayer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bonk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bonk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bonk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bonk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bonk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bonk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bonk. The network helps show where Thomas Bonk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bonk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Bonk Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Bonk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 200167
2 199941
3 200236
4 201232
5 200324
6 200123
7 200022
8 200217
9 201011
10 20023

About Thomas Bonk

Thomas Bonk is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Coconut Research and Applications (1 paper) and Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (71 citations), Molecular Biology (163 citations), Cell Biology (36 citations), Cancer Research (27 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (10 citations). Thomas Bonk has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Humeny, Cord-Michael Becker, Christian Sutter, Johannes Gebert, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, L. Wildt, C. H. Becker, Thomas Huff, Kristina Becker and Hans Georg Mannherz. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Chemistry, European Journal of Human Genetics, FEBS Letters and Psychiatric Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact