Thomas Apperley

35 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

Thomas Apperley
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 243
  • Literature and Literary Theory 159
  • Human-Computer Interaction 77
  • Sociology and Political Science 507
  • Computer Science Applications 49
Replace Susana Tosca with:
Susana Tosca Denmark
Pedro F. Hernández-Ramos United States
Simon Egenfeldt‐Nielsen Denmark
Jeroen Bourgonjon Belgium
Hans Christian Arnseth Norway
Deborah Healey Australia
Frederik De Grove Belgium
Mark Pegrum Australia
Joost Raessens Netherlands
Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan Malaysia
Thomas Apperley relative to Susana Tosca Denmark Susana Tosca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Susana Tosca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Apperley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Apperley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Apperley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Apperley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Apperley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Apperley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Apperley. The network helps show where Thomas Apperley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Apperley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Apperley Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Apperley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006292
2 201060
3 201550
4 201250
5 201149
6 201345
7 201923
8 200923
9
Gaming capital: Rethinking literacy
200919
10 201817
11 201014
12 201813
13 201812
14
'Turning Around' to the Affordances of Digital Games: English Curriculum and Students' Lifeworlds
201511
15 201311
16 20168
17 20076
18
Researching digital game players : gameplay and gaming capital
20086
19 20165
20
Using gaming paratexts in the literacy classroom
20124

About Thomas Apperley

Thomas Apperley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 36 papers that have together received 750 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (24 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (8 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (7 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (6 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (3 papers) and Digital Media and Philosophy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (243 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (159 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (77 citations), Sociology and Political Science (507 citations) and Computer Science Applications (49 citations). Thomas Apperley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Finland and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Beavis, Christopher S. Walsh, Jussi Parikka, Justin Clemens, Clare Bradford, Joanne O’Mara, Souvik Mukherjee, Lars De Wildt, Bjørn Nansen and Matthew Arnold. Their work appears in journals such as Games and Culture, Media International Australia, Literacy, Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies and Communication Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact