Thomas Apperley

43 papers receiving 705 citations

Peers

Thomas Apperley
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 272
  • Human-Computer Interaction 79
  • Literature and Literary Theory 154
  • Sociology and Political Science 537
  • Computer Science Applications 57
Replace Susana Tosca with:
Susana Tosca Denmark
Jonas Heide Smith Denmark
Joost Raessens Netherlands
Ben Bachmair Germany
Hans Christian Arnseth Norway
Simon Egenfeldt‐Nielsen Denmark
Cynthia Carter Ching United States
Mark Pegrum Australia
Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan Malaysia
Peter E. Doolittle United States
Thomas Apperley relative to Susana Tosca Denmark Susana Tosca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Susana Tosca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Apperley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Apperley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Apperley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Apperley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Apperley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Apperley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Apperley. The network helps show where Thomas Apperley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Apperley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Apperley Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Apperley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006345
2 201161
3 201259
4 201557
5 201937
6 200925
7
Gaming capital: Rethinking literacy
200920
8 201819
9 201018
10 201814
11 201813
12 201313
13
'Turning Around' to the Affordances of Digital Games: English Curriculum and Students' Lifeworlds
201512
14 20169
15 20208
16 20077
17 20167
18
Researching digital game players : gameplay and gaming capital
20086
19 20176
20 20135

About Thomas Apperley

Thomas Apperley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Computer Science Applications and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 806 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (28 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (8 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (7 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (7 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (6 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (3 papers) and Digital Education and Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (272 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (79 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (154 citations), Sociology and Political Science (537 citations) and Computer Science Applications (57 citations). Thomas Apperley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Finland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Christopher S. Walsh, Catherine Beavis, Jussi Parikka, Justin Clemens, Bjørn Nansen, Clare Bradford, Joanne O’Mara, Lars De Wildt, Souvik Mukherjee and Kishonna L. Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Games and Culture, Simulation & Gaming, First Monday, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia and The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact