Th. Wagner

942 citations
33 papers · 710 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Th. Wagner

31 papers receiving 673 citations

Peers

Th. Wagner
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 589
  • Artificial Intelligence 483
  • Condensed Matter Physics 148
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 39
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 17
Replace Joakim Bergli with:
Joakim Bergli Norway
K. Bladh Sweden
M. J. Schwarz Germany
S. A. Govorkov Canada
Lafe Spietz United States
Étienne Dumur United States
Patrick Winkel Germany
Zhe Sun China
David Hagenmüller France
K. Gao China
Th. Wagner relative to Joakim Bergli Norway Joakim Bergli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Joakim Bergli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Th. Wagner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Th. Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Th. Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Th. Wagner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Th. Wagner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Th. Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Th. Wagner. The network helps show where Th. Wagner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Th. Wagner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Th. Wagner Line = papers co-authored together Th. Wagner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003125
2 2004113
3 200657
4 200453
5 200538
6 199534
7 200433
8 200433
9 200631
10 200227
11 200220
12 200016
13 200515
14 200014
15 199911
16 200711
17 200210
18 200110
19 19959
20 19978

About Th. Wagner

Th. Wagner is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Spectroscopy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 710 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (19 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (13 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (6 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (6 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (3 papers) and Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (589 citations), Artificial Intelligence (483 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (148 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (39 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (17 citations). Th. Wagner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include M. Grajcar, H.‐G. Meyer, A. Izmalkov, A. M. Zagoskin, Alec Maassen van den Brink, Anatoly Yu. Smirnov, M. H. S. Amin, W. Krech, E. Il’ichev and E. Il’ichev. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, Journal of Low Temperature Physics and Cryogenics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact