H.‐G. Meyer

734 citations
34 papers · 591 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

H.‐G. Meyer

33 papers receiving 563 citations

Peers

H.‐G. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Condensed Matter Physics 452
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 434
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 175
  • Artificial Intelligence 86
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 103
Replace Boris Chesca with:
Boris Chesca Germany
D Balashov Germany
L. Longobardi Italy
M. Khabipov Germany
A. G. Sivakov Ukraine
T. S. Tighe United States
T. Holst Denmark
Dingping Li China
R. Shaikhaidarov United Kingdom
S. P. Zhao China
H.‐G. Meyer relative to Boris Chesca Germany Boris Chesca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Boris Chesca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.‐G. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.‐G. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.‐G. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.‐G. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.‐G. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.‐G. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.‐G. Meyer. The network helps show where H.‐G. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.‐G. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.‐G. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together H.‐G. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001147
2 201069
3 199966
4 199863
5 200139
6 199935
7 200433
8 199816
9 199814
10 199814
11 201110
12 19938
13 20018
14 20007
15 19856
16 19996
17 19996
18 19895
19 20005
20 19904

About H.‐G. Meyer

H.‐G. Meyer is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 34 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (23 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (14 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (11 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (6 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (5 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (3 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (3 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (452 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (434 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (175 citations), Artificial Intelligence (86 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (103 citations). H.‐G. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include E. Il’ichev, H. E. Hoenig, R.P.J. IJsselsteijn, V. Zakosarenko, M. Grajcar, R. Hlubina, V. Schultze, A. A. Golubov, L. Fritzsch and M. Yu. Kupriyanov. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Physica C Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact