H.‐G. Meyer

5.1k citations
177 papers · 3.5k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

H.‐G. Meyer

172 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

H.‐G. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.4k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 745
  • Artificial Intelligence 990
  • Geophysics 342
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.2k
Replace Richard J. Warburton with:
Richard J. Warburton Germany
F. C. Wellstood United States
Michael E. Gehm United States
Shinobu Onoda Japan
J. P. Wolfe United States
Carlo Jacoboni Italy
Charles Santori United States
M. Siegel Germany
Bernard Plaçais France
A. F. J. Levi United States
H.‐G. Meyer relative to Richard J. Warburton Germany Richard J. Warburton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Richard J. Warburton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.‐G. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.‐G. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.‐G. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.‐G. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.‐G. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.‐G. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.‐G. Meyer. The network helps show where H.‐G. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.‐G. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.‐G. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together H.‐G. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 177 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013145
2 2007142
3 2003127
4 2004116
5 200698
6 201195
7 200888
8 200877
9 200166
10 200464
11 200657
12 201357
13 199957
14 201157
15 200454
16 200249
17 201146
18 201846
19 201545
20 201345

About H.‐G. Meyer

H.‐G. Meyer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 177 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (64 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (45 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (35 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (31 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (24 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (22 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (16 papers) and Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.4k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (745 citations), Artificial Intelligence (990 citations), Geophysics (342 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.2k citations). H.‐G. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Ronny Stolz, M. Grajcar, E. Il’ichev, L. Fritzsch, A. Izmalkov, V. Schultze, R.P.J. IJsselsteijn, V. Zakosarenko, T. May and S. H. W. van der Ploeg. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physical Review Letters and Physica C Superconductivity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact