H.‐G. Meyer

5.1k citations
176 papers · 3.4k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

H.‐G. Meyer

171 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

H.‐G. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.3k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 720
  • Artificial Intelligence 976
  • Geophysics 339
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.2k
Replace Richard J. Warburton with:
Richard J. Warburton Germany
F. C. Wellstood United States
Shinobu Onoda Japan
J. Dupont-Roc France
Holger Fehske Germany
J. P. Wolfe United States
Charles Santori United States
Michael E. Gehm United States
Carlo Jacoboni Italy
M. Siegel Germany
H.‐G. Meyer relative to Richard J. Warburton Germany Richard J. Warburton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Richard J. Warburton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.‐G. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.‐G. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.‐G. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.‐G. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.‐G. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.‐G. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.‐G. Meyer. The network helps show where H.‐G. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.‐G. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.‐G. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together H.‐G. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 176 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013145
2 2007140
3 2003126
4 2004116
5 200697
6 201192
7 200886
8 200875
9 200463
10 200162
11 200657
12 201357
13 199955
14 201154
15 200454
16 200248
17 201545
18 201145
19 201845
20 201344

About H.‐G. Meyer

H.‐G. Meyer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 176 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (63 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (45 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (35 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (31 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (24 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (21 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (16 papers) and Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.3k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (720 citations), Artificial Intelligence (976 citations), Geophysics (339 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.2k citations). H.‐G. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Ronny Stolz, M. Grajcar, E. Il’ichev, A. Izmalkov, L. Fritzsch, V. Schultze, R.P.J. IJsselsteijn, V. Zakosarenko, T. May and S. H. W. van der Ploeg. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physical Review Letters and Physical Review B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact