H.‐G. Meyer

169 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

H.‐G. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 995
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.1k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 275
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.1k
Replace Richard John Warburton with:
Richard John Warburton Germany
T. Van Duzer United States
D. Drung Germany
Martin van Exter Netherlands
R. H. Koch United States
Alex I. Braginski Germany
Michael Mück Germany
Zhen Wang China
S. A. Werner United States
F. C. Wellstood United States
H.‐G. Meyer relative to Richard John Warburton Germany Richard John Warburton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Richard John Warburton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.‐G. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.‐G. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.‐G. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.‐G. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.‐G. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.‐G. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.‐G. Meyer. The network helps show where H.‐G. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.‐G. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.‐G. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together H.‐G. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 175 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007158
2 2013148
3 2003134
4 2004127
5 2010123
6 2011103
7 2008100
8 200696
9 200879
10 200165
11 200665
12 200464
13 201161
14 199958
15 200458
16 201358
17 200654
18 201854
19 200252
20 201350

About H.‐G. Meyer

H.‐G. Meyer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 175 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting and THz Device Technology (89 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (43 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (26 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (21 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (17 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (14 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (12 papers) and Geophysical Methods and Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (995 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.1k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (275 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.1k citations). H.‐G. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Ronny Stolz, M. Grajcar, Evgeni V. Il’ichev, A. Izmalkov, Ludwig Fritzsch, V. Schultze, R.P.J. IJsselsteijn, V. Zakosarenko, S. H. W. van der Ploeg and T. May. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Physica C Superconductivity, Review of Scientific Instruments and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact