Teng Chen

4.3k citations
131 papers · 3.0k · 1 hit paper · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Teng Chen

125 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Teng Chen's Hit Papers

Emergence of African Swine Fever in China, 2018 2018 · 461 citations
4610+2+5Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Teng Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Biological Psychiatry 256
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 706
  • Neurology 357
  • Oral Surgery 291
  • Archeology 336
Replace Bkc Chow with:
Bkc Chow Hong Kong
Masayuki Nakamura Japan
K. C. Kent Lloyd United States
Michael Brüss Germany
Christine Bôle‐Feysot France
Odile Kellermann France
Chen Zhang China
R Sullivan Australia
Vladimir N. Babenko Russia
Claudia Eder Germany
Teng Chen relative to Bkc Chow Hong Kong Bkc Chow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×67.2×
Bkc Chow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Teng Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Teng Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teng Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teng Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Teng Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Teng Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Teng Chen. The network helps show where Teng Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Teng Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Teng Chen Line = papers co-authored together Teng Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Emergence of African Swine Fever in China, 2018
Hit paper breakdown →
2018461
2 2012335
3 201986
4 202172
5 201170
6 201256
7 202055
8 202152
9 202151
10 200849
11 201646
12 201844
13 201842
14 201642
15 201542
16 201441
17 201140
18 201938
19 201836
20 201334

About Teng Chen

Teng Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Archeology, Oral Surgery and Genetics, having authored 131 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (23 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (19 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (17 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (15 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (14 papers), dental development and anomalies (14 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (13 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (256 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (706 citations), Neurology (357 citations), Oral Surgery (291 citations) and Archeology (336 citations). Teng Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Xintao Zhou, Rongliang Hu, Shoufeng Zhang, Faming Miao, Yonghui Dang, Yu-cheng Guo, Ming Xu, Yanjiong Chen, Yuzi Luo and Nan Li. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Legal Medicine, Forensic Science International, Viruses, Neuropharmacology and Frontiers in Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact