Lu Li

2.2k citations
105 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

  • Marketing top 5%
    • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
    • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Paleontology top 10%
    • Evolution and Paleontology Studies

Papers in

Lu Li

98 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Lu Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Marketing 157
  • Paleontology 99
  • Anthropology 102
  • Plant Science 297
  • Pharmaceutical Science 48
Replace Mingzhi Li with:
Mingzhi Li China
S.A. Johnson United States
Peter Murray Australia
Jiajing Wang China
Carl Mann France
Hongtao Li China
Robert C. Anderson United States
Jan van der Ploeg Netherlands
Patricia Harris United States
Lu Li relative to Mingzhi Li China Mingzhi Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Mingzhi Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lu Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lu Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lu Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lu Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lu Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lu Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lu Li. The network helps show where Lu Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lu Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lu Li Line = papers co-authored together Lu Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010239
2 2013152
3 2008110
4 201366
5 202159
6 201651
7 202347
8 201346
9 201642
10 201638
11 201538
12 200729
13 202126
14 202226
15 202224
16 200922
17 202021
18 202320
19 201620
20 202119

About Lu Li

Lu Li is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 105 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (14 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (11 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (10 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (6 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (5 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (5 papers) and Covalent Organic Framework Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (157 citations), Paleontology (99 citations), Anthropology (102 citations), Plant Science (297 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (48 citations). Lu Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Junfeng Zhang, Jeffrey S. Podoshen, Yan Luo, Zhenhua Guo, Fanglin Guan, Huali Lin, Yan Luo, Tianxiao Zhang, Gang Chen and Chenglong Deng. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Genomics, Virus Research, Plants, Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology and Journal of Systematics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact