Tejas Desai
Impact in
- Health top 2%
- Social Media in Health Education
- General Dentistry top 10%
Papers in
- Health 12
- Social Media in Health Education 12
-
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility 9
- Co-authors
- Afreen Shariff (4 shared papers)Deeba Minhas (2 shared papers)María Ferris (7 shared papers)Xiangming Fang (5 shared papers)Cynthia Christiano (5 shared papers)Aabid Shariff (2 shared papers)Kenar D. Jhaveri (3 shared papers)Michael A. Thompson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (3 papers)Clinical Kidney Journal (2 papers)Journal of Nephrology (2 papers)Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (2 papers)Renal Failure (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Tejas Desai
28 papers receiving 753 citations
Tejas Desai's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Health 218
- General Dentistry 21
- General Health Professions 307
- Gender Studies 75
- Emergency Medicine 59
Countries citing papers authored by Tejas Desai
This map shows the geographic impact of Tejas Desai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tejas Desai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tejas Desai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tejas Desai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tejas Desai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tejas Desai. The network helps show where Tejas Desai may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tejas Desai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is Content Really King? An Objective Analysis of the Public's Response to Medical Videos on YouTube Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 276 |
| 2 | 2012 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 92 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 50 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 2 |
About Tejas Desai
Tejas Desai is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Communication and Dermatology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media in Health Education (12 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (9 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (5 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers) and Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (218 citations), General Dentistry (21 citations), General Health Professions (307 citations), Gender Studies (75 citations) and Emergency Medicine (59 citations). Tejas Desai has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Afreen Shariff, Deeba Minhas, María Ferris, Xiangming Fang, Cynthia Christiano, Aabid Shariff, Kenar D. Jhaveri, Michael A. Thompson, Ruben A. Mesa and Naveen Pemmaraju. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Clinical Kidney Journal, Journal of Nephrology, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation and Renal Failure.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.