Countries where authors publish in Clinical Kidney Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Kidney Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Kidney Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal.
About Clinical Kidney Journal
The 3.4k papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal in the last decades have received a total of 39.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal usually cover Nephrology (1.4k papers), Transplantation (145 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (600 papers), Emergency Medical Services (107 papers) and Hematology (162 papers) specifically the topics of Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (457 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (422 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (233 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (216 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (171 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (144 papers), Vasculitis and related conditions (141 papers) and Complement system in diseases (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Kidney Journal are Markus Ketteler, Willi Jahnen‐Dechent, Alberto Ortíz, Kitty J. Jager, Carmine Zoccali, José António Lopes, Friedo W. Dekker, Sofía Jorge, Norbert Lameire and Merel van Diepen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.