T.E. Bowling
Impact in
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Gastroenterology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology 24
- Surgery 15
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 4
- Co-authors
- D.B.A. Silk (10 shared papers)D. B. A. Silk (8 shared papers)Ana H. Raimundo (4 shared papers)Elizabeth A Stokes (2 shared papers)G. Grimble (1 shared paper)Peter W. Jones (1 shared paper)Marilyn James (1 shared paper)A R Hatfield (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Gut (8 papers)Clinical Nutrition (7 papers)Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (5 papers)Gastroenterology (2 papers)Age and Ageing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNorwaySouth Africa
In The Last Decade
T.E. Bowling
48 papers receiving 904 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Nutrition and Dietetics 372
- Gastroenterology 64
- Physiology 249
- Surgery 317
- Speech and Hearing 43
Countries citing papers authored by T.E. Bowling
This map shows the geographic impact of T.E. Bowling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.E. Bowling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.E. Bowling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T.E. Bowling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.E. Bowling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.E. Bowling. The network helps show where T.E. Bowling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside T.E. Bowling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 194 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 103 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 65 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 43 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 39 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 25 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 24 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 17 | Oesophageal metallic stent dysfunction: first reported case of stent fracture and separation. | 1999 | 16 |
| 18 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 10 |
About T.E. Bowling
T.E. Bowling is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Surgery, Gastroenterology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 52 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (24 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (9 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (8 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (4 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (4 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (4 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers) and Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (372 citations), Gastroenterology (64 citations), Physiology (249 citations), Surgery (317 citations) and Speech and Hearing (43 citations). T.E. Bowling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include D.B.A. Silk, D. B. A. Silk, Ana H. Raimundo, Elizabeth A Stokes, G. Grimble, Peter W. Jones, Marilyn James, A R Hatfield, Susan Galbraith and M.F. Spittle. Their work appears in journals such as Gut, Clinical Nutrition, Proceedings of The Nutrition Society, Gastroenterology and Age and Ageing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.